Like many industries starting off, social commerce lacks a clear definition. There are many different terms that exist used to define this concept as Paul Marsden illustrates in his blog SocialCommerceToday.
Between 2005 and 2007 he collected 17 definitions and had the excellent idea of copying them all down in Wordle in order to see the many terms linked to this industry. Here is the result:
In doing this, Paul Marsden was able to come up with his own definition (18):
“Social commerce: A subset of electronic commerce that employs collaborative social media tools to assist in online purchasing and selling”.
Definitions definitely vary depending on whether one is a retailer or a “shopper”; or whether or not the application point is an individual consumer or a friend in a social network.
By mapping these points of view on symmetrical axes we get a graph of 18 terms, now 19 including the one that I propose for SherPad, which emphasizes the word of mouth strategy, conversations between friends, and social networks.
(19)“Social Commerce rises through trusted advice in conversations and word-of-mouth among your friends and relations in social networks, blogs, and communities, helping to make shopping decisions and transactions”.
For each definition, the four most relevant key words were kept. There is a certain tendency to see the most recent definitions show at the top, combine the issue of social networks, links between friends, and favor the “shopper’s” point of view.
However, this is not irreversible, as the definitions of IBM and Paul Marsden, which are situated in the lower part, state:
IBM: “Social commerce: Connect and foster active participation with customers to help improve your customer experience…including ratings and reviews, blogs and micro-blogging, as well as forums and communities”.
There is a difference, or maybe even an opposition, between the definition given by Bazaarvoice, the societal leader in consumer review, and the one of Paul Dunay.
Bazaarvoice:
“Social commerce: Strategy of connecting customers to customers online and leveraging those connections for commercial purpose”.
Paul Dunay:
“Social commerce: Working with or using your social graph, which is defined as your followers or your friends, and allowing them to help you make buying decisions”.
Will social commerce continue to develop along these two different points of view or will they merge together?
Showing posts with label Paul Dunay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Dunay. Show all posts
Dec 5, 2009
Oct 14, 2009
From Social Marketing to Social Commerce
On the Internet e-marketing is linked much more to e-commerce than marketing and commercial activities outside of the Internet.
This is even more the case with social networks. Social marketing and social commerce often overlap each other. If the second one is not yet come about, it is very possible that it will directly develop from the first.
Several recent contributions by reputable commentators are following the leads of both E-Marketer and WebPro News.
Chris Crum wrote on WebPro News “Beyond Social Media Marketing to Actual E-Commerce”
“We talk a lot about social media marketing – using social networks like Facebook and Twitter to market brands and drive traffic to sites. There is no question that these can be effective tools for doing both of these things”.
But will social marketing remain limited to these two objectives? Is it just a question of developing a fan base and then directing it to brand sites or E-commerce sites?
“As time goes on, it may become helpful or perhaps even necessary to use these tools for actual e-commerce. The common thinking behind social media marketing is that you don’t want to be too sales-pitchy in your conversations, and in some ways that is still very true. However, while social media is largely about conversations, it’s not only about conversations”.
Activity on social networks is not, strictly speaking, only built on conversations. For dozens of millions of young people and more and more adults, social networks have become a “hang out place” that have developed into mediums where one can share photos or even play between friends, on asynchronous mode . All these are social activities that continue or strike up conversations.
He adds however that people are not content with conversations only,
“They are looking for information. They’re using social networks to help them make purchase decisions. Sometimes this is through conversation. Sometimes it’s as simple as being a fan of a brand’s Facebook page and receiving timely updates.”
The commercial outlet of all this social activity is logical. It is the outcome of two symmetrical forces at work.
There is an obvious social aspect to shopping that has been part of our culture for a long time while shopping also plays an integral part in our social relations. Take, for example, the Tupperware network that developed in 1948.
Denise Zimmerman, president of NetPlus Marketing Inc. was actually just interviewed on this subject by E-Marketer, “Social Shopping and the Brand Experience” and talks about a natural evolution.
“If you successfully connect and make shopping valuable to the community in a way that’s easy and accessible and meets their needs, it’s a no-brainer”.
As a matter of fact, Facebook just simplified Facebook Connect implementation on web sites. This is currently the best way to link E-commerce sites to the network which has an extremely practical advantage.
Paul Dunay, Global Managing Dir. of Services, Social Marketing Avaya, was also interviewed by E-Marketer, “The Future of Social Shopping” touching upon the practical aspect of Facebook Connect, and closing with a definition of Social commerce,
“Social commerce is working with or using your social graph, which is defined as your followers or your friends, and allowing them to help you make buying decisions.”
“Facebook Connect would allow you to go to a website like Dell.com and authenticate yourself using your Facebook profile, allow your identity to be known and access friends so you could spark up a chat. So I could say, “Hey, Jeff, I’m looking at this new fancy laptop or this netbook. I heard you bought something. Would you recommend this to me?”
All this, he adds, would be like virtually taking your friends shopping with you. In order to do this, internet search will have to go through your graph of friends, and perform what Paul Dunay calls a “social search”.
However, for this concept to work, it is necessary for those in our social graph to identify their consumer skills, and even some of their purchases allowing them to become public to our friends.
Lack of privacy and consuming information not meant to be shared creates an obvious objection to this idea.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


